Nuke Plant Tax Break Criticized
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration wants
to change the tax code to make sure all owners of nuclear power plants
can write off the cost of decommissioning.
Utilities that have rates set by government agencies
already can deduct the money they must set aside in special funds for decommissioning,
typically hundreds of millions of dollars. The tax break is not automatically
transferred, however, when a plant is bought by a company without regulated
rates.
In those cases, the Internal Revenue Service must
approve a tax break. The IRS has done that routinely since a flurry of
nuclear plant sales began two years ago. Even so, opponents who don't want
to see the tax break written into law contend it will do nothing but guarantee
more revenue for plant owners.
``This won't produce a single more megawatt of
electricity to meet summer reliability needs,'' said Howard Learner of
the Chicago-based Environmental Law and Policy Center. ``All it will do
is transfer hundreds of millions of dollars from consumers' wallets to
nuclear plant owners'.''
Supporters say it makes no sense for a tax break
already in place for a plant not to be automatically transferred to a new
owner.
``There's absolutely no reason for any distinction
to be made here,'' said David Brown, lobbyist for Chicago-based Exelon
Corp., the largest private nuclear operator in the United States.
The issue is growing in importance because more
nuclear power plants are likely to be sold as electricity is increasingly
deregulated across the country. New Orleans-based Entergy Corp., for example,
has said it plans to spend up to $1.5 billion to acquire as many as a dozen
plants in the next five years.
Like private companies, most ``public'' utilities
are owned by investors. The difference is they are obligated to provide
power to everyone in their service areas. In exchange for their monopoly
status, their rates and earnings are regulated by states.
The tax break was vetoed in 1999 by President
Clinton but was revived by the Bush administration and approved last week
as part of the House energy bill. It faces an uncertain future in the Senate,
which will consider its own energy package this fall.
Now, when nuclear power plants are sold from rate-regulated
to nonregulated owners, the decommissioning money doesn't retain the ``qualified''
tax status and thus are no longer tax deductible.
The new owners still are required by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission to maintain the funds to ensure that money is on
hand to close and clean the plants safely after they stop generating power.
Electric companies, which contributed more than
$18.5 million to Democratic and Republican candidates and parties in the
1999-2000 election cycle, say it's a case of tax law not keeping up with
changes in the electricity marketplace.
Since Entergy bought the Pilgrim Nuclear Power
Station in Plymouth, Mass., from Boston Edison Co. in July 1999, eight
nuclear reactors have been sold from rate-regulated to nonregulated owners.
The biggest deal was closed four months ago, when
Richmond, Va.-based Dominion Resources Inc. bought the Millstone nuclear
power complex in Waterford, Conn., for $1.3 billion.
A change in the law, said Ron Clements, a power
industry lobbyist, would help facilitate deals that might otherwise fall
through, keeping nuclear plants online to churn out much-needed electricity
for homes and businesses.
In cases where deals go through anyway, customers
will end up paying more for power, he said.
``Rates will go up,'' said Clements, of the Edison
Electric Institute, the main trade association of private power companies.
Critics say it's wrong to give a tax break to
corporations that want to maximize their profits and thus could bear the
costs of decommissioning.
``Fair is fair,'' Learner said. ``It's part of
the cost of doing business.''
The congressional Joint Committee on Taxation
has estimated that the change, and other tax changes related to nuclear
decommissioning, would cost the federal government $1.93 billion in revenue
from 2002-2011.
On the Net: Nuclear Regulatory Commission: http://www.nrc.gov
|